Leptosphaeria maculans - Evaluation
Entire data about trials

Summer Canola


Locality
Year
Growth stage
of Canola (BBCH)
Date Growth stage
of Canola (BBCH)
Seed Dressing 1x 2x 3x DAM Ref. prep. Atonik % Efficiency Stat. Cogency Infestation
Domanínek 16.7. 17.4 0 Yes             30 A %90,99 weak
2001 67 25.5. 13   Yes           20 A  
    8.6. 15     Yes         40 A  
median                     30    
ref. prep.   17.4. 0           VITA   20 A  
                           
Kujavy                          
2001 16.8. 17.4.   Yes             8,96 A %90,99 weak
  65 - 67 23.5. 13 Yes Yes     Yes     20,90 A  
    7.6. 39 - 42 Yes   Yes         23,88 A  
median                     17,13    
ref. prep.   17.4.             ROV   20,90 A  
                           
Krás. Údolí 20.7. 25.4.   Yes             48,50 B %99,95 medium
2001 67 - 69 31.5. 13 Yes Yes           60,80 BC  
    15.6. 19 Yes   Yes         69,44 C  
median                     59,58    
ref. prep.                 CAR   61,79 BC  
                           
  26.8.     Yes             46,24 B %90,99 medium
  83     Yes Yes           55,16 B  
        Yes   Yes         54,46 B  
median                     51,95    
ref. prep.                 CAR   48,36 B  
                           
sum       Yes             47,19 B,B medium
        Yes Yes           57,48 C,BC %95.99
        Yes   Yes         60,67 C,C  
median                     55,35    
ref. prep.                 CAR   53,96 BC, BC  

Legend to tab “Leptosphaeria maculans”

Application of POLYVERSUM
Seed dressing – dry Seed dressing 2000g per ton of seed
1x spray 100g/ha
2x two sprays 100g /ha
3x three sprays 100g/ha
DAM 120 l of nitrogen liquid fertilizer per hectare in first treatment

Chemical treatment
VITA - seed dressing with Vitavax 200 FF - 4 l/t
Sprays:
ROV - Rovral – 1.5 l/ha
CAR - Caramba – 1.5 l/ha
HOR - Horizon – 1.5 l/ha
Atonik – 0.6 l /ha

Red written values are up the chemical reference.
Green written values are under the chemical reference.
Blue written values are under the chemical reference, but with efficiency up 50 %.
Purple written values show efficiency of referential preparation.

Comments:
Testing of preparation POLYVERSUM was done in 10 trials a preparation was compared with fungicides Rovral, Caramba, Horizon, Vitavax 200 FF. Mentioned preparations were applied to winter and summer canola in combination with plant growth stimulator Atonik as states in tabs.
Polyversum was applied 48 times.
In 30 cases was reached better evaluation than by reference fungicide treatment.
In 7 cases was efficiency of Polyversum higher than 50 %, but lower than efficiency of chemical preparations.
In 11 cases were results of tested biopreparation worst than chemical standard.

The preparation was applied in one, two or three terms – growth stages of canola.
First treatment in stages (BBCH) 18 -25
Second treatment in stages (BBCH) 30 - 38
Third treatment in stages (BBCH) 45 – 60

Application is fully in correspondence with recommendation of manufacturers of referential fungicidal standards. (BBCH 11-32 and 32- 60)

Infection ascends in time of observations from low to medium pressure.

Gained values are seemingly non-homogenous. That is reason, why was calculated correlation coefficient between group treated with chemical fungicides and between group treated with Polyversum. Because value of this coefficient is 0.886 is correlation between both groups very tight.
(Tab value for a 0.005 – 16 terms is 0.6622). Low values by both groups are caused of other events than is tested preparation. This fact confirms contradictory phenomenon – High efficiency in both assessed files in the same locality. These phenomena - high or low efficiency – are identically influenced either by force of infection, climatic conditions in specific locality or condition of the crop. In the case of occurrence and development of pathogen, the both groups show high efficiency.

From above results, that efficiency of preparation Polyversum is comparable with chemical standards- this is documented by statistical cogency – and is influenced by instantaneous condition of environment as well as artificial fungicides.

As the best method of application appear two or three sprays.
First treatment in stages (BBCH) 25 – 30
Second treatment in stages (BBCH) 35 – 45
Third treatment in stages (BBCH) 45 - 55

The application with liquid fertilizer DAM 390 is possible.

For practical application is suitable to modify application window as is showed

Treatment
Growth stage of canola
1
BBCH 15 - 30
2
BBCH 30 - 40
3
BBCH 40 - 65